Prejudice

  • Defining Prejudice
  • Preconceived negative judgment of a group and its individual members
  • Individual members are judged solely on their group membership
  • Beliefs about the personal attributes of a group of people
  • Supported by stereotypes

Types of Prejudice

  • Racism
  • Prejudicial attitudes and discriminatory behavior toward people of a given race
  • Sexism
  • Prejudicial attitudes and discriminatory behavior toward people of a given sex

Components of Prejudice

  • Two components of Prejudice
  • Cognitive Component: the attitude
  • Stereotype
  • Behavioral Component: the behavior
  • Discrimination

Stereotypes: Cognitive Component

  • Defining Stereotype
  • A generalization about a group of people in which identical characteristics are assigned to virtually all members of the group, regardless of actual variation among the members
  • Can be either positive, negative or neutral
  • A type of cognitive shortcut- heuristic
  • Stereotypes are/do not necessarily
  • Emotional
  • Lead to discrimination* Falsely founded

Example of a Stereotype

  • Gender Stereotype
  • Women are seen as more nurturing and less assertive than men
  • Evolutionary psychologists argue that the difference is due to a basis in the behaviors required for reproductive success

* Stereotype that has some basis of truth

Discrimination: Behavioral Component

  • Defining Discrimination
  • An unjustified negative or harmful action towards a member of a group, simply because of his or her membership in that group

Inducing Prejudice – Real World Experiment

  • School teacher Jane Elliott
  • Divided her class according to eye color
  • Blue and brown
  • Those children with blue eyes were given preferential treatment and told they were superior to the brown eyed children
  • Results (less than 30 minutes later)
  • Blue- eyed children
  • Began taunting and criticizing the brown-eyed children
  • Brown-eyed children
  • Lowered self-esteem and lower academic performance that day

Explaining Prejudice

  • Two explanations
  • Cognitive Explanation
  • Prejudice and Economic Competition: Realistic Conflict Theory

Prejudice: Cognitive Explanation

  • Cognitive Explanation
  • Byproduct of categorization, schemas, and heuristics
  • How prejudice arises* Faulty Memory Processes/Problems Processing Information
  • How prejudice persists

Categorization, Schemas and Heuristics

  • How they work
  • Processes that extract information from our environment
  • Information is then used to create categories* Once categories are formed, this information is used to put things (people, events, objects) into aforementioned categories
  • These processes allow Social Categorization

Social Categorization

  • Social categorization follows those same steps with individuals* However, due to the complexity of an individual it is difficult to create categories that both separate individuals and do not overlap
  • e. person doesn’t belong to more than one category, categories are distinct from one another
  • Result
  • In-group bias and out-group homogeneity bias

In-Group Bias

  • Defining In-Group Bias
  • Two parts
  • Positive feelings and special treatment we reserve for people we have

defined as being part of our in-group

  • Negative feelings and unfair treatment we reserve for others simply because we have defined them as being in the out-groups (groups which an individual does not identify with)
  • May be due to self-esteem maintenance (Tajfel)

Out-Group Homogeneity Bias

  • Defining Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
  • The perception that those in the out-group are more similar (homogenous) to each other than they really are
  • Example
  • Cross race effects in eye witness identification
  • Numerous studies have found significantly more false identifications when the “witness” is identifying someone of a differing race.

Prejudice: Cognitive Explanation

  • Cognitive Explanation
  • Byproduct of categorization, schemas, and heuristics
  • How prejudice arises* Faulty Memory Processes/Problems Processing Information
  • How prejudice persists

Faulty Memory Processes/Problems Processing Information

  • Two main reasons prejudices persist
  • It is primarily the emotional aspect of attitudes that makes a prejudiced person hard to argue with (i.e. illogical)
  • Firmly established schema for the target group(s)
  • leads them to pay attention to (and therefore recall)
  • information consistent with their beliefs
  • leads you to ignore (and therefore forget)
  • information inconsistent with their beliefs

Explaining Prejudice

 

Two explanations

  • Cognitive Explanation
  • Prejudice and Economic Competition: Realistic Conflict Theory

Prejudice: Realistic Conflict Theory

  • Realistic conflict theory
  • limited resources theory lead to conflict between groups and result in increased prejudice and discrimination
  • several historical studies document that discrimination against out-groups correlates with the scarcity of jobs or other resources

Realistic Conflict Theory: Sheriff et. al (1961)

  • Robber’s Cave” experiment
  • Methods
  • created two groups of 12 year old boys at a summer camp
  • eagles and rattlers
  • Three phases
  • groups were isolated and placed in situations designed to increase group cohesiveness
  • groups were brought together to participate in a series competitive activities
  • hostilities escalated
  • researchers tried to eliminate hostility by eliminating the games and increasing between-group contact
  • unsuccessful

Ways to Reduce Prejudice

  • Contact Hypothesis
  • merely bringing members of different groups into contact with each other will erode prejudice
  • somewhat unsuccessful
  • e. desegregation

Ways to Reduce Prejudice: Contact Hypothesis

  • Allport (1954) six required conditions
  • Mutual interdependence
  • situations where two or more groups need each other and must depend on each other in order to accomplish a goal
  • A common goal that is important to both of them
  • Equal status of group members
  • Having informal interpersonal contact
  • Multiple contacts with several members of the out-group so that individuals can learn that their beliefs are wrong
  • Social norms in place that promote equality