Selection\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/u><\/em><\/strong>= We choose the environment.<\/p>\n

\n
• Cdn be trividl \/ importdnt.<\/em><\/li>\n
• Is determined by our persondlity<\/em><\/li>\n
• Whether we wdnt to interdct is determined by the persondlity of dnother<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

  Selection of partner hypotheses:<\/p>\n

  \n
  • Similarity hypothesis\n
    \n
    • People with similar traits are attracted to each other.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n
    • Complementarity hypothesis\n
      \n
      • People with complementary traits are attracted to each other.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

        Conclusion: Across a great majority of studies the similarity hypothesis was right.<\/p>\n

        Assortative mating phenomenon = People select people to be their partner who are similar to them.<\/p>\n

        Research by Botwin and colleagues: There is a strong correlation between desired characteristics and those of the actual partner.<\/p>\n

        Speed ddting resedrch by Asendorpf dnd colledgues:<\/em><\/p>\n

        \n
        • Men: physical characteristics<\/li>\n
        • Women: additional traits<\/li>\n
        • Little evidence for the similarity hypothesis.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

          Conclusion:<\/em><\/p>\n

          \n
          • Simildrity with pdrtner dnd desired pdrtner<\/em><\/li>\n
          • Not with speed ddting<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

            Relationship satisfaction is not due to similarity but to the personality of the partner.<\/p>\n

            Traits that play a role in relationship satisfaction<\/h1>\n

            \n
            • High Agreeableness<\/li>\n
            • High Conscientiousness<\/li>\n
            • High Openness<\/li>\n
            • Low Neuroticism<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

              Traits that play a role in the prediction of divorce<\/h1>\n

              \n
              • High Neuroticism<\/li>\n
              • Low Conscientiousness<\/li>\n
              • Low Agreeableness<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                Higher extraversion \uf0e0 more likely to enter a relationship<\/p>\n

                Higher extraversion \uf0e0 more likely to break up<\/p>\n

                To what extend do personality traits and personality similarity play a role in the selection of friends?<\/strong><\/p>\n

                Important, but different contributions from:<\/p>\n

                \n
                • Extraversion (select more people to be friends)<\/li>\n
                • Agreeable (selected by more people to be friend)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                  Later research: The role of personality profile similarity and friendship intensity.<\/p>\n

                  Examined effects of:<\/p>\n

                  \n
                  • Actual similarity (not an important predictor for friendship intensity)<\/li>\n
                  • Perceived similarity<\/li>\n
                  • Peer-rated similarity (= similarity of more people\u2019s ratings)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                    Evocation<\/u><\/em><\/h2>\n

                    \n
                    • Personality traits in others evoke responses in us and the other way around<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                      What elicits anger and rage? –\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 High neuroticism<\/p>\n

                      \n
                      • Low conscientiousness<\/li>\n
                      • Low agreeableness<\/li>\n
                      • Low openness<\/li>\n
                      • High dominance (subfacet of E)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                        Personality can evoke support<\/p>\n

                        Manipulation<\/u><\/em><\/h2>\n

                        \n
                        • Personality is linked to ways we try to influence and manipulate others<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                          Manipulation techniques (Buss and colleagues)<\/p>\n

                          \n
                          • Coercion (forcing and demanding stuff)<\/li>\n
                          • Hardball (lying, physical aggression)<\/li>\n
                          • Silent treatment<\/li>\n
                          • Responsibility invocation (\u2018your responsibility\u2019)<\/li>\n
                          • Social comparison (everyone else is doing it)<\/li>\n
                          • Self-abasement (being submissive)<\/li>\n
                          • Charm<\/li>\n
                          • Reason (logical argument)<\/li>\n
                          • Pleasure induction (it\u2019s going to be so much fun)<\/li>\n
                          • Monetary rewards<\/li>\n
                          • Regression (acting childlike to get what you want)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                            How did they come up with this list?<\/p>\n

                            \n
                            • Act-nomination (Chapter 3)<\/li>\n
                            • S-data<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                              Gender differences in preferred techniques:<\/p>\n

                              \n
                              • Buss (1992) only for regression<\/li>\n
                              • Butkovich & Bratko (2009) virtually all techniques<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                                Clear link between amount of manipulation, manipulation strategies and the Big Five.<\/p>\n

                                The \u2018Dark Triad\u2019 of Personality<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n

                                \n
                                • Machiavellianism <\/em><\/strong>= Using somebody else for your own personal gain.\n
                                  \n
                                  • Don\u2019t criticize important people.<\/li>\n
                                  • Say what others want to hear.<\/li>\n
                                  • Do not trust anyone and never reveal your motives to others. \uf0b7 Make up a false but credible motive if someone asks for it.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                                    Success depends on group context and structure. The more loosely a situation is structured, the more successful Machiavellianism is.<\/p>\n

                                    Extreme selfishness, with a grandiose view of one\u2019s own talents and a craving for admiration, as characterizing a personality type.<\/p>\n

                                    \n
                                    • Narcissism <\/em><\/strong>= Extreme selfishness, with a grandiose view of one\u2019s own talents and a craving for admiration, as characterizing a personality type.\n
                                      \n
                                      • Exhibitionism<\/li>\n
                                      • Overly positive (but fragile) self-image<\/li>\n
                                      • Self-focused<\/li>\n
                                      • Uses others to maintain self-image Selection:<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n
                                      • Select specific people dnd situdtions Evocdtion:<\/em><\/li>\n
                                      • Try to gdin ddmirdtion from others Mdnipuldtion:<\/em><\/li>\n
                                      • Highly mdnipuldtive<\/em><\/li>\n
                                      • Ego-centric<\/em>\n
                                        \n
                                        • Others hdve to dct dccordingly, becduse otherwise\u2026<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n
                                        • Psychopathy<\/em><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                                          <\/h1>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                          Selection\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 = We choose the environment. Cdn be trividl \/ importdnt. Is determined by our persondlity Whether we wdnt to interdct is determined by the persondlity of dnother Selection… Continue Reading Personality and Social Interaction<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[111],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.amyork.ca\/academic\/zz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4415"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.amyork.ca\/academic\/zz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.amyork.ca\/academic\/zz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.amyork.ca\/academic\/zz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.amyork.ca\/academic\/zz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4415"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.amyork.ca\/academic\/zz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4415\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.amyork.ca\/academic\/zz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4415"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.amyork.ca\/academic\/zz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4415"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.amyork.ca\/academic\/zz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4415"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}